Of course, the fashion for them continues, but the rate of release of such models has decreased, manufacturers no longer argue so zealously the need to "bend" panels, because for large.


5 Best Gaming Monitors for PS4 Pro Free ITIL 4 books
Let's touch on the topic of curved screens a bit.

Moreover, wide matrices, this feature has become the norm, which surprises quite differently than a couple of years back. Without it, the color rendition at the edges of the screen will be more different from the center zone, monitors will take up more workspace, and users will have to turn their heads more often. Working with such models in CAD programs, doing 3D modeling is not the most comfortable and pleasant pastime. It is difficult to get used to not noticing curved lines (which should be straight), but with a strong desire it is quite possible. If your field of activity does not provide for working with such software, then you should not worry again - take it and do not think. This also applies to small Curved displays and 5 Best Gaming Monitors for PS4 Pro. In them, the curvature of the panel is a tribute to fashion and an attempt to slightly improve the stability of the picture over the entire area of ​​the matrix.

Depending on the selected screen diagonal and aspect ratio, you may be left with several options for working resolution, or you may be limited to one single option.

Among the gaming Full HD, there are models from 23.5 to 32 inches, UFHD (2560 × 1080 pixels) - only 34 inches, WQHD live in the segment of 23.8-31.5-inch solutions, UWQHD will conquer you with a diagonal of 34-35 inches, and high-speed 4K is now only found among 27-inch monitors.

The higher the screen resolution, the higher the level of pixel density (ppi), which directly affects the clarity of the picture. The difference is clearly visible when placing models with different ppi levels next to each other, it is striking when moving from a model with a low ppi to a solution with a high one, but it quickly disappears if the distance to the screen is quite large and just over time - a habit is developed ... We will not talk about the need to buy models with a high screen resolution, because many people are still satisfied with large Full HD models with "fat pixels", so this moment is very individual. However, if finances and vision allow, then it is still better to give preference to models with a high pixel density.

The second reason to consider high-resolution models is the desire to see more on the screen without having to swipe and open tabs. Of course, the size of work items and text will be smaller (when comparing models with the same diagonal), but the quality of detail will be high. Work will become more comfortable and productivity will increase. In the case of games, the difference will be more determined by the aspect ratio than by the working resolution. The only thing you can count on when increasing it is reducing the size of some interface elements, graphic blocks and text. But how important it is for the player is a big question!

The third and most important point for those who like to play is the difference in the load on the computing components of the system. Most of all, this affects the graphics subsystem in complex calculations. And if for games in Full HD resolution with medium graphics settings, an Nvidia GTX 1050 Ti may now be enough (and a GTX 1060 for high quality settings, and with a margin for a few more years), then for WQHD it is better to look towards the GTX 1070 and 1070 Ti. for UWQHD (3440 × 1440) - on GTX 1080 and 1080 Ti, and for a comfortable game in 4K, it is advisable to set aside money for new generation cards - and then you will not have to think about replacing in the next 1-2 years (if you are very lucky). However, if a stable 30-40 fps is enough for you or you agree to medium and low graphics settings, then the list of suitable options can be safely expanded.

Separately, I would like to touch on the topic of buying a monitor with a high resolution and its further use at lower values. The option, of course, is appropriate when your new video card has not yet arrived from the store, but from our point of view, it is still not worth doing this "permanently". By doing this, you kill the whole point of purchasing an expensive display: the clarity and quality of the picture is reduced due to the use of interpolation algorithms. In some models this mode works better, in others it is worse, but it will definitely not work to achieve the same quality as in the “native” resolution.